Anda belum Log-in!
Silahkan Log in

Selamat Datang di Portal Digital Content Publisher
Selasa , 03 November 2026

Perpustakaan sebagai jantung pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia, harus mampu memberi kontribusi yang berarti bagi pelaksanaan proses belajar mengajar di perguruan tinggi.

TRUNOJOYO » Tugas Akhir & Skripsi » Sastra Inggris
di-posting oleh 150511100001 pada 2019-07-29 15:53:40  •  220 klik

An Analysis of Modality in Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts.
An Analysis of Modality in Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts.

disusun oleh LULU` ULFIYAH APRILIA


Subyek: Modality
Epistemic
Deontic
Kata Kunci: Modality
Epistemic
Deontic

[ Anotasi Abstrak ]

This study is concerned with modality. This study used Palmer’s (1986) theory to analyzed Modality and Halliday (2008) to analyze the meaning of modality. Relating to the statements above, this study was proposed to answer two articulated research problems, namely; (1) What are the types of modality found in Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts? And (2) To what extent do Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts show similarities and differences, if any, in their use of types of modality? Those research problems were related to the speech texts by Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel. This study employs a descriptive qualitative design. The data were all of the speech by Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts that contain modality. In addition, content analysis is applied to obtain the data in which the writer becomes the key instrument of the study. Interactive data analysis, then, is conducted to analyze and explain the data. This study shows the findings of the types of modality and the similarities and differences in types of modality. In terms types of modality, 30 data of modality were found. The data are classified into two types of modality: Epistemic modality consists of 10 data; judgments (5 data) and modifications (5 data). Deontic modality consists of 20 data; directives (3 data), modifications (4 data), subjectivity (5 data), imperatives (3 data), commissives (2 data), and volitives (3 data). Moreover, in terms of similarities and differences, the data are classified into two terms similarities and differences. The writer found 11 data of similarities and differences in types of modality: In terms of similarities in types of epistemic (3 data) and similarities in type of deontic (2 data). In terms of differences in epistemic (2 data) and differences in deontic (4 data). Keywords: Modality, Epistemic, and Deontic


Deskripsi Lain

This study is concerned with modality. This study used Palmer’s (1986) theory to analyzed Modality and Halliday (2008) to analyze the meaning of modality. Relating to the statements above, this study was proposed to answer two articulated research problems, namely; (1) What are the types of modality found in Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts? And (2) To what extent do Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts show similarities and differences, if any, in their use of types of modality? Those research problems were related to the speech texts by Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel. This study employs a descriptive qualitative design. The data were all of the speech by Emma Watson and Michael Kimmel’s Speech Texts that contain modality. In addition, content analysis is applied to obtain the data in which the writer becomes the key instrument of the study. Interactive data analysis, then, is conducted to analyze and explain the data. This study shows the findings of the types of modality and the similarities and differences in types of modality. In terms types of modality, 30 data of modality were found. The data are classified into two types of modality: Epistemic modality consists of 10 data; judgments (5 data) and modifications (5 data). Deontic modality consists of 20 data; directives (3 data), modifications (4 data), subjectivity (5 data), imperatives (3 data), commissives (2 data), and volitives (3 data). Moreover, in terms of similarities and differences, the data are classified into two terms similarities and differences. The writer found 11 data of similarities and differences in types of modality: In terms of similarities in types of epistemic (3 data) and similarities in type of deontic (2 data). In terms of differences in epistemic (2 data) and differences in deontic (4 data). Keywords: Modality, Epistemic, and Deontic

Kontributor: Misnadin, S.S., M.A., Ph.D
Tanggal tercipta: 2019-07-03
Jenis(Tipe): Text
Bentuk(Format): pdf
Bahasa: Indonesia
Pengenal(Identifier): TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877
No Koleksi: 150511100001


 Download File Penyerta (khusus anggota terdaftar)

 File PDF  1. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-COVER.pdf - 1060 KB
 File PDF  2. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-ABSTRACT.pdf - 257 KB
 File PDF  3. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-CHAPTER I.pdf - 277 KB
 File PDF  4. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-CHAPTER II.pdf - 324 KB
 File PDF  5. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-CHAPTER III.pdf - 387 KB
 File PDF  6. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-CHAPTER IV.pdf - 611 KB
 File PDF  7. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-CHAPTER V.pdf - 265 KB
 File PDF  8. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-REFERENCES.pdf - 229 KB
 File PDF  9. TRUNOJOYO-Tugas Akhir-16877-APPENDIXES.pdf - 474 KB


 Dokumen sejenis...

     Tidak ada !

 Dokumen yang bertautan...





 Kembali ke Daftar