Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kelompok belanja di Universitas Trunojoyo Madura dalam Supply Positioning Model dan Supplier Perception Model masuk di kuadran apa, kelompok belanja apa saja yang perlu dilakukan konsolidasi paket agar jumlah paket dan tingkat ketertarikan penyedia terhadap paket pengadaan di UTM bisa tinggi serta strategi pengadaan apa yang paling tepat digunakan untuk tiap enam belas kelompok belanja yang diteliti. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain penelitian tindakan melalui teknik pengumpulan data kualitatif. Pengambilan sampel secara purposive, kuesioner kepada PPK dan perwakilan organisasi pengguna barang dan jasa serta pengumpulan dokumentasi data belanja tahun 2018 dan 2019 untuk penelitian Supply Positioning Model dan untuk penelitian Supplier Perception Model kuesioner kepada penyedia yang berkontrak tahun 2018 dan 2019 serta data kontrak tahun 2018 dan 2019. Teknik analisa data pada penelitian Supply Positioning Model menggunakan AHP, TOPSIS dan Relative Closesness, sedangkan penelitian Supplier Perception Model menggunakan validitas, Reliabilitas dan IPA. Dari hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa kelompok belanja di UTM tersebar di 7 variasi kuadran dalam Dutch Windmill, ada 8 kelompok belanja yang harus dilakukan penurunan jumlah paket dengan cara konsolidasi paket, sedangkan untuk strategi perencanaan pengadaannya dengan berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan barang dan Jasa Pemerintah tiap kelompok belanja berbeda strateginya diantaranya kelompok belanja perlu melakukan konsolidasi paket, menggunakan jenis kontrak payung, e-purchasing, tender/seleksi atau pengadaan langsung hingga membuat pagu anggaran lebih wajar, melaksanakan proses pengadaan diawal tahun anggaran sedangkan khusus perencanaan konstruksi dilaksanakan di tahun anggaran sebelumnya bahkan beberapa kelompok belanja perlu menjaga kerjasama dengan pihak penyedia sehingga didapat proses pengadaan yang efisien, efektif dan menghindarkan pengelola pengadaan dari burnout employee.


Deskripsi Lain

This study aims to determine the shopping group at Trunojoyo University Madura in the Supply Positioning Model and Supplier Perception Model in what quadrant, what shopping groups need package consolidation so that the number of packages and the level of provider interest in procurement packages at UTM can be high and what procurement strategy is most appropriate for each of the sixteen shopping groups studied. The research design used is an action research design through qualitative data collection techniques. Purposive sampling, questionnaires to PPK and representatives of organizations using goods and services as well as collecting documentation of spending data in 2018 and 2019 for Supply Positioning Model research and for Supplier Perception Model research, questionnaires to providers with 2018 and 2019 contracts as well as 2018 and 2019 contract data. The data analysis technique in the Supply Positioning Model research uses AHP, TOPSIS and Relative Closesness, while the Supplier Perception Model research uses validity, reliability and IPA. From the results of the study, it is known that the shopping groups at UTM are spread across 7 quadrant variations in the Dutch Windmill, there are 8 shopping groups that must be reduced in the number of packages by package consolidation, while for the procurement planning strategy based on Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Procurement of Government goods and services, each spending group has a different strategy, including the shopping group needs to consolidate packages, using umbrella contracts, e-purchasing, tender/selection or direct procurement to make the budget ceiling more reasonable, carrying out the procurement process at the beginning of the budget year, while specifically for construction planning carried out in the previous budget year, even some spending groups need to maintain long-term cooperation with the provider so that they can get efficient, effective procurement process and prevent procurement managers from employee burnout.